Online Now 1224

13 For ’13 At ND: Where’s Your ID?

Everett Golson

Everett Golson evolved as a passer and runner as the 2012 regular season progressed. Does that lend itself to a faster-paced offense in 2013?

In Part 7 of our 13-part series, we look at relatively new figures, or topics, that might play an important role in Notre Dame’s 2013 success.

Lou Somogyi
    • It's time for this offense to become a strength of this team. Two years ago the offense lost games with turnovers. Last year the offense played not to lose the game. Now it's time to become a top 15-20 offense. We need to able to win games with our offense as well as our defense. If the defense is outmatched, like it was against Alabama, the offense needs to be good enough to win the game. That will put us one step closer to elite.

      This post was edited by tomporraz on 1/26/2013 at 8:24 AM

      tomporraz

    • I think it will depend on the RB's. What they are able to do, who gets playing time, their style. This IMHO will decide alot of how Kelly and Co choose to plan each game. I also think it will have to be about controlling distractions. Not controlling them showed up big time in the Bowl game. Im a realist, I dont feel ND had a chance against Alabama, but it should have been alot closer. No one can tell me that Teo wasnt extremely distracted and had zero focus. Kelly had already been in contact with the NFL, and also was aware of the possible fallout of the Teo situation. My point being that you have to have a plan in place in case things dont go according to Hoyle. What I did not see this year the wide receivers to big consistent threats. That in and of itself scares me for 2013. Sorry off on a tangent. Lou, is it just me or does the lack of a big time wide receiver make you nervous for next fall? Couple that with new backs.......

      aceinthehole

    • tomporraz said...

      It's time for this offense to become a strength of this team. Two years ago the offense lost games with turnovers. Last year the offense played not to lose the game. Now it's time to become a top 15-20 offense. We need to able to win games with our offense as well as our defense. If the defense is outmatched, like it was against Alabama, the offense needs to be good enough to win the game. That will put us one step closer to elite.

      AGREED

      carminedesapio

    • aceinthehole,

      I don't get nervous when it comes to matters with the football team because that is out of my domain, and it's not a life-or-death situation.

      But yes, I understand your thoughts about the receiving corps. For at least the last four years, Notre Dame has a clearly defined "1" receiver, a premier NFL prospect, be it Golden Tate, Michael Floyd or Tyler Eifert, with many of them often complementing off each other. At this point, I can't say that about 2013. I do believe DaVaris Daniels might have that type of skill set down the road, but I think he's about another year away from developing that type of consistency in all facets of his game.

      It's not about catching a long pass here or there, or being reliable on the 8-to-10-yard patterns. It's about a defense having to game-plan around you consistently for 60 plays or so, which then opens up other avenues or derivatives of the offense. That doesn't mean the offense can't be effective. It's just that other areas have to pick up the slack, as the running game did this year. However, when you lose your top two backs, All-America TE and don't have that "1" receiver, it's really going to have to be a strong collective effort.

      Lou Somogyi

    • the ND offense has many areas to improve upon. the OL, which is the key to all offenses, needs to become dominant. this year they showed improvement, but they were not dominant against the better opponents. hiestand did a good job mixing a flawed group. basically, we were playing 5 guard size OL. zmartin plays well at OT, but he is not sized for the position. imo, lombard should be a guard and i am hoping that stanley is ready to takeover at RT and move lombard this year.

      the passing game only used the space from the #s to the sidelines. i am not sure if this is by design, although i suspect that BK did not want EG throwing over the middle because of the increased risk of INT. but, we need to use the whole field. we need to use more crossing patterns to help our WRs. it helps the dbs if they know that most patterns are vertical.

      This post has been edited 2 times, most recently by phineas on 1/26/2013 at 10:06 AM

      phineas

    • aceinthehole said...

      I think it will depend on the RB's. What they are able to do, who gets playing time, their style. This IMHO will decide alot of how Kelly and Co choose to plan each game. I also think it will have to be about controlling distractions. Not controlling them showed up big time in the Bowl game. Im a realist, I dont feel ND had a chance against Alabama, but it should have been alot closer. No one can tell me that Teo wasnt extremely distracted and had zero focus. Kelly had already been in contact with the NFL, and also was aware of the possible fallout of the Teo situation. My point being that you have to have a plan in place in case things dont go according to Hoyle. What I did not see this year the wide receivers to big consistent threats. That in and of itself scares me for 2013. Sorry off on a tangent. Lou, is it just me or does the lack of a big time wide receiver make you nervous for next fall? Couple that with new backs.......

      In my humble opinion, I thought Davaris Daniels was a big time bright spot in the national championship game. I think he is ready to take that next step and become a number one receiver. TJ Jones also took a big step forward this past year and will be a solid number two guy in 2013. If one of Daniel Smith, Justin Ferguson, Chris Brown, or Davonte Neal can step up in 2013 and emerge like Davaris Daniels did in 2012, then I think ND has the makings of a very good core group of receivers. Hopefully, two of these guys will emerge to add some depth.

      In an ideal world, I believe Brian Kelly would rather run more 3-WR sets than two-TE sets. ND is working closer to the point where we can consistently put 3 to 4 WRs on the field at a time. If you look at recruiting over the last three cycles including this year's class, we have added 8 quality WR prospects. With Golson's continued development and the new WRs on the roster, ND will be a very dangerous offense in years to come.

      schott135

    • Chuck Martin's remarks are both telling and puzzling. On the one
      hand, as Lou stresses in this article, Brian Kelly is "flexible", adjusting his offense not only to the strengths and talent of his offensive people, but to the strengths and talents of his defense and special teams. And, of course, this is what one would want in a coach. When done correctly, as this year, it produced a winning percentage of approximately 92% (12-1).

      The comment does raise the question----in an ideal world, what offensive identity is Kelly trying to build at ND? For example, think Ara, think Devine, think Holtz---ND under these coaches had an offensive identity. Until Martin's comments, I had assumed that for Brian Kelly, it was a spread, up-tempo offense. Now, we are
      told that "up-tempo" is not exactly Brian Kelly.

      Question---what kind of offense does Brian Kelly want to have? What can it be labeled, other than "flexible."

      This post was edited by hemy on 1/26/2013 at 10:51 AM

      hemy

    • This post is for members of BlueandGold or All Access VIP members only. Start Free Trial

      NDFan76

    • This post is for members of BlueandGold or All Access VIP members only. Start Free Trial

      65too

    • This post is for members of BlueandGold or All Access VIP members only. Start Free Trial

      Lou Somogyi

    • This post is for members of BlueandGold or All Access VIP members only. Start Free Trial

      frase

Already have an account? Sign In

Add a comment
Want to be involved in the discussion? Start Free Trial