Online Now 1030

Michigan series put on hold

Danny Spond

Notre Dame and Michigan have played continously since 2002.

Notre Dame's long-standing rivalry with Michigan will be at least temporarily put on hold in years to come, according to the Wolverines' athletic director Dave Brandon.

Brandon confirmed an Associated Press report on the athletic department's website Tuesday morning that three previously scheduled games from 2015-17 will not be played. The two teams are still slated to play during the next two seasons.

"The decision to cancel games in 2015-17 was Notre Dame's and not ours," Brandon said in a statement. "We value our annual rivalry with Notre Dame but will have to see what the future holds for any continuation of the series. This cancellation presents new scheduling opportunities for our program and provides a chance to create some new rivalries."

Notre Dame associate athletic director John Heisler said he was not aware of the series being canceled as of Tuesday morning. He added that Irish athletic director Jack Swarbrick is in a months-long process of schedule shuffling in order to accommodate the school's new relationships with the Atlantic Coast Conference.

Notre Dame joined the ACC in all sports but football and hockey earlier this month and agreed to play five ACC football teams each season as part of the deal. Swarbrick said at the time that some of the regular games against Big Ten opponents would be played on a less regular basis.

"We made it clear that we were going to have to make some decisions relative to making it fit in the ACC," Heisler said.

Michigan and Notre Dame have played 40 times since the two schools first met in 1887. The Wolverines hold a 23-16-1 series advantage. The last year that they didn't meet was in 2001.

Dan Murphy
    • Michigan will replace ND with some directional school, like other members of the Big 10 schedule

      illjack

    • This post is for members of BlueandGold or All Access VIP members only. Start Free Trial

      wjasonp

    • i dont like this at all, i love our rivalry with Michigan! and it really sucks if we dont keep playing them on a regular basis.

      williemcgraw88

    • I'm upset. I think this is an important rivalry, IMO.

      kking

    • This post is for members of BlueandGold or All Access VIP members only. Start Free Trial

      cdarcy

    • This post is for members of BlueandGold or All Access VIP members only. Start Free Trial

      brenner_f

    • I don't like it. This is why I wasn't a huge fan of the playing 5 teams in the ACC a year. I'd much rather play a tough, traditional game like Michigan than Duke.
      I know we took a hiatus in the past, so hopefully they can return as regulars on our schedule.

      PBeuerlein

    • I have no problem stopping this series. I have never considered Michigan one of the great ND rivals. They have had many great games but I'm fine with this. Michigan has 2 main rivals ( OSU, MSU ) and ND is not one of them.

      NDRichie

    • ND is Michigan's 3rd biggest rival. Ask almost anyone on their board and they will agree with that statement. And you can make a STRONG valid case that Michigan is ND's 2nd best rivalry. A rivalry is not just about longevity and continued years either. Its also, more importantly, about the success of both programs on the national level and very close games that always seem to go one way or the other. Not traditionally one sided affairs like Purdue and Navy.
      I would really hope that we look at rotating the three Big Ten schools in the future. Playing two of the three on any given year. I will hold out some hope anyway!

      brenner_f

    • As a fan of ND, I think this sucks. I enjoy my annual smack talking with my friends that are UM fans. This seems like the road we are headed down though, just doesn't mean it makes me happy.

      Of course I am not expecting the staff at ND to think about my happiness when they make decisions regarding the entire university.

      Febiv

    • When the ACC announcement was made, I stated that I would prefer to drop Mich St instead of Michigan. However, I did acknowledge that one of them had to go. After time to reconsider, Michigan is the logical one to drop. Purdue is in state and there is a deeper history with Michigan State. The three that CANNOT be dropped are: USC, Stanford and Navy. Without Navy, there may not be a Notre Dame. Need the west coast swing every year, so you have to keep both Cali schools.

      dheinen

    • They will be replaced those three years by FSU, Clemson, and VaTech. I have no problem with this. I would however, rather see it become an every other year type of game if it all possible. I believe it's better for college football when Michigan/Notre Dame play each other.

      simm

    • I was hoping this series would survive, i like the rivalry with them. I hope we can schedule them more in the future.

      edd1066

    • Think of it this way--when we do play them in the future, it will be that much bigger.

      Look, I like playing Michigan every year, too, but this will be a good chance to start and renew other rivalries. I'd like to play FSU every year to give the newer generations of ND fans to experience the same type of rivalry we have with Michigan.

      An FSU series would only increase our chances with Florida recruits, as well. Hell, Clemson has gotten some game changing prospects on both sides of the ball in recent years--I wouldn't mind stealing a few from them.

      ATX ND

    • ATX ND said...

      Think of it this way--when we do play them in the future, it will be that much bigger.

      Look, I like playing Michigan every year, too, but this will be a good chance to start and renew other rivalries. I'd like to play FSU every year to give the newer generations of ND fans to experience the same type of rivalry we have with Michigan.

      An FSU series would only increase our chances with Florida recruits, as well. Hell, Clemson has gotten some game changing prospects on both sides of the ball in recent years--I wouldn't mind stealing a few from them.

      There won't be any ACC every year series. Much like BC will not be.. it will be strictly on an equal rotation with every ACC school

      brenner_f

    • brenner_f said...

      Other than USC this is the one I least wanted to lose :( Me as a fan for the last 20 years...it seemed to be the game that held the most meaning.

      Exactly, brenner.

      This was the early season weather-vane game. A victory over UM often signals a good or great season, while a loss often indicates the opposite.

      Other than USC-ND, which is the greatest intersectional rivalry of all time, UM-ND is the fiercest rivalry re ND has and a rivalry of regional equals.

      The loss of this game on a virtually annual basis is one of the things I feared with the ACC affiliation and why, among other reasons, I still oppose it.

      Risksorter

    • I think this is a bad move by the ND. I think the game is good for many reasons and the proximity of the schools is one, They are two of the traditional powers over the years. I would have dumped MSU is a heart beat.

      Gulinias

    • brenner_f said...

      There won't be any ACC every year series. Much like BC will not be.. it will be strictly on an equal rotation with every ACC school

      ^^^^^this

      There are currently 14 ACC schools. We will play 5 each year, with a duplicat opponent in the last year. Each school must be an opponent every three years. Not sure how they will assign home and away.

      FamilyMan5

    • I always enjoy the Michigan series. However, Michigan has been among the biggest pains in the butt Notre Dame has ever dealt with. I'm not speaking of wins and losses, or the difficulty of winning or losing this game. I'm speaking of the bigotry and venom that has come from the Michigan administration through the years. Those who have been around long enough, and know enough of Notre Dame history know what I'm talking about. Michigan does not deserve to be on our schedule.

      From my personal point of view, I will miss the game. However, from a championship standpoint, it's logical to eliminate a power game, particularly one that comes so early in the season. At Notre Dame, the only goal is to win national championships. Playing Michigan in the first or second game of the season can deflate our whole balloon, while they still have a conference championship to strive toward. Playing five ACC games per year will, at least in many years, see us facing at least one of FSU, Miami, Clemson, Va Tech, North Carolina, etc. Those programs all have tremendous potential. We don't need yet another power game on the schedule, so the most logical thing is to trade one for another. It's too bad it has to be a game we all enjoy so much, but it's probably in the program's best interest.

      Mr Rice128364

    • People act like we play this game every year and that is just not true. Saturday night was the 40th meeting between these 2 schools. They have taken numerous breaks in the series including 1983-1984, 1995-1996, 2000-2001, 2018-2019, plus 35 years between games from the mid 40's to the mid 70's. It is not like the USC rivalry that we have played every year(other than during WWII) since 1926, or the significance of the Navy rivalry of which we will never cancel, or Purdue who we have played every year since the 40's iirc, heck we have even played MSU more frequently than Michigan. I understand because of the history that Michigan is up there on the list of teams we want to play but it's not quite the "rivalry" in my mind that many make it out to be. But that is just one man's opinion!

      WE ARE ND76

    • Just a little side note here, the Detroit Free Press is reporting that Michigan State AD Mark Hollis has not had any discussions with Notre Dame about cancelling their current series. Both teams do have clauses in the contract to bail of future games.

      Dan Murphy

    • Mr. Rice said...

      I always enjoy the Michigan series. However, Michigan has been among the biggest pains in the butt Notre Dame has ever dealt with. I'm not speaking of wins and losses, or the difficulty of winning or losing this game. I'm speaking of the bigotry and venom that has come from the Michigan administration through the years. Those who have been around long enough, and know enough of Notre Dame history know what I'm talking about. Michigan does not deserve to be on our schedule.

      From my personal point of view, I will miss the game. However, from a championship standpoint, it's logical to eliminate a power game, particularly one that comes so early in the season. At Notre Dame, the only goal is to win national championships. Playing Michigan in the first or second game of the season can deflate our whole balloon, while they still have a conference championship to strive toward. Playing five ACC games per year will, at least in many years, see us facing at least one of FSU, Miami, Clemson, Va Tech, North Carolina, etc. Those programs all have tremendous potential. We don't need yet another power game on the schedule, so the most logical thing is to trade one for another. It's too bad it has to be a game we all enjoy so much, but it's probably in the program's best interest.

      Agree 100% with Mister Rice

      DuquesneDuke

    • WE ARE ND76,

      Completely agree. In 2015-16 and 2019 -20 you already have Texas and USC on the schedule. Potentially you could have another power game on there with Florida State, Clemson or Virginia Tech (if they're still good then), and teams like Michigan State, Purdue or Stanford almost always bring their best game of the year versus ND.

      Yearly trips to California were a priority, and that likely will remain with trips to USC in even-numbered years and Stanford in odd.

      Likewise, for recruiting purposes, a presence is needed in the Southwest (Texas specifically), which is why aforementioned Texas games have been scheduled, the game in Arlington next year with Arizona State, and Oklahoma in 2012-13.

      The east, Atlantic seaboard and Georgia and Florida are covered in the ACC. Something had to be sacrificed, and it's the Michigan series. But you still keep the regional Midwest ties with Michigan State and Purdue, keeping the schedule fairly realistic.

      Lou Somogyi

    • This post is for members of BlueandGold or All Access VIP members only. Start Free Trial

      wjasonp

Already have an account? Sign In

Add a comment
Want to be involved in the discussion? Start Free Trial