Online Now 964

Notre Dame’s “Big Three”

Manti Te'o

Manti Te'o and the Irish defense have allowed only 30 points so far this season, the fewest in the first three games since 27 in 1988.

Notre Dame’s early 3-0 success has been relatively easy to define. Can it sustain it for a few more months?

Lou Somogyi
    • The one thing I have commented on before is the way BK has been building a great defense. A great defense will overcome the mistakes that a good offense makes.
      Mike Leach is a good example TT had a great scoring offense but could never field a good defense, it was always about scoring more points than the other team. Bk has built a really good defense that may be great before long,and has added the word TEAM into the mix. Gotta love it. Go KLM the Big Texan, Go Irish

      TX Irish

    • Great management of field position last week. If not Manti, then I hope Turk got the game ball.

      joeatlND

    • TXIrish,

      Agreed, but Kelly kind of had to follow the same M.O. at Cincinnati, where he admitted he had to "shoot the threes" to stay competitive. At schools like Cincinnati, Texas Tech or Washington State, you need more gimmicks, something to sell to skilled recruits that distinguishes you from the pack, and Leach has done that well. It's not unlike when Joe Tiller took over at Purdue. He had to go to the "basketball on grass" approach, because he knew he wasn't going to be able to go straight up in recruiting with the Ohio States, Michigans Penn States, etc.

      At a school like ND with the national schedule it plays, the blueprint is different, and to his credit, Kelly recognized that (with Jack Swarbrick also providing the overview).

      Lou Somogyi

    • three keys apparent in the mich. st. game.the forementioned kicking of turk.the three down lineman getting great pressure in a passing situationwhen the last time that happend.kelly going for it in a fourth down when he could have punted and getting it.this sent a message to his offensive line that he has confidence in them and to future opponents.

      billyd

    • I agree with your assessment to the 2002 team. I hope if the Irish go to a BCS. bowl like the 2002 team that the results will be better than they were against Oregon State.This years team I believe because of their depth on the defensive front seven will preform better in a BCS game than the 2002 team.if the Irish are fortunate enough to make a BCS. bowl. For right now let us just concentrate on beating Michigan.

      frase

    • It's time to focus on Michigan. They will come in hungry. It won't be any fun discussing our 3-1 team next week, so we must get it done. This is, without a doubt, the key game of the season. If something is, indeed, happening here, we must get this opponent off our backs. They have killed the last three seasons for us! Go Irish!

      Blueman

    • This post is for members of BlueandGold or All Access VIP members only. Start Free Trial

      cdarcy

    • Given that ND ranks 96th in punt returns, isn't there plenty of "hidden yardage" available to the Irish? With the success of the team, we don't hear much about the lack of a punt return game as we did last year. However, I'm still concerned that in games where inches count, the lack of a punt return is going to hurt the team. Does anyone know why BK has implemented a fair catch strategy? I presume it's a strategy.

      NDcowboy

    • NDcowboy,

      Most of the time Kelly and the team will go to a "punt safe" formation. They did it four times against Purdue, and I'm sure there must have been a wariness against MSU to watch for some chicanery after getting beat there two years ago on a fake field goal that resulted in a TD.

      There was a 12-yard return by Neal in the second quarter, though, that set ND up at the 50 with ND already ahead 7-0. That led to the misdirection play with Atkinson that gained 32 yards. Maybe not that big a deal, but setting up at the 50 with that return was pretty darn good and maybe underrated.

      The new punt formations, as featured in August, generally preclude huge returns. This year with Neal they might take more chances, but it's a baby steps issue there right now.

      Lou Somogyi

    • Yea, Lou you are dead on with the Leach, Tiller, and other examples. Those programs are always hot and cold, and most of the time don't get the top recruits. It just seems like BK has been very good recruiting top defensive players the last 2 years. As for Jack Swarbrick, I say he is the Heisman trophy winner of the ADs', for the decade, for what he has done for all the sports.

      TX Irish

    • Good read, Lou.

      Pangborn86

    • This post is for members of BlueandGold or All Access VIP members only. Start Free Trial

      NDcowboy

    • I get the "safe mode" on punt returns- making sure there isn't a fake. But while in safe mode, why don't they block the guy opposite on the line? They're just letting the punt coverage team run free. Why?

      ShelbyIrish

    • ShelbyIrish,

      I'm not a coach and can't even pretend to go into all the technicalities of it, but here's the best explanation I can give through the coaches regarding the complaints on punt returns or blocking with the new alignment:

      The Shield
      In recent years, “The Shield” in punt coverage has helped minimize returns in the college game.

      Unlike in the NFL, where only the two gunners are permitted to take off more than one yard down the field prior to the kick, the college rule permits the front seven to run down prior to the kick.

      Thus, the formation in vogue in the collegiate game as opposed to “pro punt” has the seven front-line players (three on each side of the snapper) spread out to cover punts, and then three blockers — many times offensive linemen — in front of the punter. The three who were lined up in front of Turk in the Aug. 15 practice were sophomore offensive linemen Nick Martin and Matt Hegarty, and sophomore linebacker Jarrett Grace.
      At least three purposes are served with The Shield:

      • Much more people can get into coverage quicker, which usually requires more frequent fair catches everywhere, not just at Notre Dame.
      • With the blockers spread out up front, more skill and speed can be put along the line for coverage, while a couple of linemen are put in to protect the punter. Faster people along the line allow for quicker overall coverage, allowing it to smother potential returns before they can set up.
      • The wide splits along the line help spread out the punt return defense, thereby lessening the chance for a blocked punt as well.

      “In this game with the shield punt and the fact that (the coverage is) able to get out so early, if you look at the stats around the nation, there aren’t that many punt returns happening,” said first-year Irish special teams coordinator Scott Booker, who also coaches the tight ends.

      Although Notre Dame attempted only 13 punt returns in 2011, or an average of one per game, Florida International University led the nation in punt return average (15.93) — but returned only 15 punts in 13 games. Northwestern was No. 2 (15.86) — and returned just eight punts, or five fewer than the Irish. Ole Miss ranked No. 3 with just 14 punt returns.

      The two teams that had the most punt returns with 41 apiece were Ohio U (14 games) and Penn State (13 games), or an average of three per game. While Notre Dame returned only 13 punts in 2011, its opponents combined for only 15 returns against them.

      That’s not to say Booker and Co., are waving the white flag this season when it comes to punt return. The punt return stats might not make or break a team’s campaign, but the three punt return yards Notre Dame totaled during its 12-game regular season also is unacceptable.

      “We had Rocket and Tim Brown, but those rules didn’t apply when they played,” Kelly said. “So not to take anything away from their ability, but we certainly do not want to be where we were last year.”

      In practice situations, the staff attempts to distract the players catching punts by throwing towels or other objects in front of their faces, among other tactics, while the ball is in the air.

      However, Booker says it’s hardly about just the return man. It’s more about getting just enough blocking up front to help ward off the vast and spread out coverage team. Booker said a lot of the concentration has been on helping hold up the coverage — without getting called for holding, of course.

      “We’re looking for guys up front who are able to do the techniques and the things were asking them to do to hold and to give those guys in the back end — whoever it is — a crease to go,” Booker said. “That’s a very important part of the equation. We’re working hard at trying to work on our tie-up and tie those guys up at the line of scrimmage — and then put someone out there that can go vertical.”

      A stronger investment into the punt return game just might yield some overall better returns.

      Lou Somogyi

    • Lou, I'm glad you mentioned Jack Swarbrick. I think this is the best Head Coach/AD combo at Notre Dame since Moose and Ara. I remember Moose warned Ara before going out to USC in 1964, about their superior athletes. I think Kelly has learned the same lesson, you don't out-athlete USC, you out-hit them. Punch them in the mouth til they quit. Lou had that lesson down pat which is why he won 10 straight against them.

      This post was edited by topgome on 9/19/2012 at 5:29 PM

      topgome

Already have an account? Sign In

Add a comment
Want to be involved in the discussion? Start Free Trial